Phase Transition and Symmetry Breaking in the ShunyaBar System

🎧 Listen to the Podcast

Navokoj - Learn about the ShunyaBar solver’s phase transition approach to optimization

Traditional Optimizers vs ShunyaBar’s Navokoj Solver

Traditional optimization methods like gradient descent and simulated annealing get trapped in local minima because they commit to a solution basin too early in the exploration process. These solvers collapse from the high-dimensional search space into a limited region before understanding the global landscape structure.

The ShunyaBar Navokoj solver fundamentally changes this paradigm by maintaining a high-symmetry “liquid” phase throughout the exploration phase. Rather than prematurely crystallizing into a local solution, Navokoj stays in the quantum superposition of all possible solutions until the entire constraint landscape has been globally mapped. Only then does it trigger a controlled phase transition, crystallizing into the optimal solution through spontaneous Galois symmetry breaking. This approach leverages number theory’s Galois symmetry breaking to systematically explore and understand optimization basins before committing to a final assignment.

Checkout Navakoj by ShunyaBar Labs for more information about how effective the solver is.

Abstract: Arithmetic-Geometric Quantum Statistical Mechanics

SAT = PHASE TRANSITION + GALOIS SYMMETRY BREAKING: The ShunyaBar functional \(Z_{SB}(\psi) = \mathrm{Tr}(e^{-\beta L_\psi}) \cdot \prod_{k=1}^\infty \left(1 - \frac{1}{p_k^{\Gamma_k(\psi)}}\right)\), where \(L_\psi\) is a state-dependent graph Laplacian encoding geometric interactions and \(\Gamma_k(\psi) = \beta \cdot \gamma_k(\psi)\) with constraint “tightness” \(\gamma_k(\psi) > 0\), embeds into a C*-dynamical system exhibiting phase transition at critical inverse temperature \(\beta_c = 1\). For \(\beta \leq 1\) (high temperature), there is a unique KMS\(_\beta\) state representing high symmetry. For \(\beta > 1\) (low temperature), there are infinitely many extremal KMS\(_\beta\) states parameterized by \(\hat{\mathbb{Z}}^\times \cong \mathrm{Gal}(\mathbb{Q}^{\text{cyc}}/\mathbb{Q})\), with spontaneous symmetry breaking under arithmetic action on zero-temperature states. This generalizes the Bost-Connes theorem while incorporating continuous geometric structure via the Laplacian, enabling efficient optimization through controlled phase transitions.

---

Theorem: Phase Transition and Symmetry Breaking in the ShunyaBar System

The ShunyaBar functional:

\[Z_{SB}(\psi) = \mathrm{Tr}(e^{-\beta L_\psi}) \cdot \prod_{k=1}^\infty \left(1 - \frac{1}{p_k^{\Gamma_k(\psi)}}\right)\]

where \(L_\psi\) is a state-dependent graph Laplacian encoding geometric interactions (e.g., variable-clause graph in SAT), and \(\Gamma_k(\psi) = \beta \cdot \gamma_k(\psi)\) with \(\gamma_k(\psi) > 0\) measuring normalized constraint “tightness” (low \(\gamma_k\) for satisfied constraints, high for violated), can be embedded into a C*-dynamical system exhibiting a phase transition at critical inverse temperature \(\beta_c = 1\). Specifically:

• For \(0 < \beta \leq 1\) (high temperature), there is a unique KMS\(_\beta\) state.
• For \(\beta > 1\) (low temperature), there are infinitely many extremal KMS\(_\beta\) states, parameterized by the group \(\hat{\mathbb{Z}}^\times \cong \mathrm{Gal}(\mathbb{Q}^{\text{cyc}}/\mathbb{Q})\), with spontaneous symmetry breaking under the arithmetic action on zero-temperature states.

This generalizes the Bost-Connes theorem to incorporate continuous geometric structure via the Laplacian, while preserving the arithmetic phase transition driven by the prime-weighted product.

---

Construction of the Dynamical System

1. Arithmetic Component: Deformed Zeta Function

The product term \(\prod (1 - p_k^{-\Gamma_k(\psi)})\) represents the Euler product for the reciprocal of a “deformed zeta function”:

\[\zeta_\psi(\beta) = \prod_k (1 - p_k^{-\beta \gamma_k(\psi)})^{-1}\]

where \(\gamma_k(\psi)\) are state-dependent exponents. For constraint optimization, we define \(\gamma_k = 1/v_k(\psi)\) with \(v_k\) a smooth violation measure, ensuring \(\gamma_k \to \infty\) for satisfied constraints and \(\gamma_k \to 1^+\) for violated ones to avoid poles in the zeta function.

2. Geometric Component: Laplacian Spectral Geometry

The trace \(\mathrm{Tr}(e^{-\beta L_\psi})\) represents the partition function of a quantum harmonic oscillator on the graph with Laplacian \(L_\psi = D_\psi - A_\psi\), where the degree matrix \(D_\psi\) and adjacency matrix \(A_\psi\) depend on \(\psi\) (weighted by violation gradients in optimization contexts). This geometric term captures the topological and spectral properties of the constraint satisfaction landscape.

3. C*-Algebra Construction

We define the C*-algebra \(A\) as the tensor product:

\[A = A_{\text{arith}} \otimes A_{\text{geom}}\]

where: - \(A_{\text{arith}} = C^*(\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}) \rtimes \mathbb{N}^\times\) is the Bost-Connes algebra, generated by phases \(e(r)\) for \(r \in \mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}\) and isometries \(\mu_n\) for \(n \in \mathbb{N}^\times\). - \(A_{\text{geom}}\) is the graph C*-algebra associated with the variable interaction graph.

The algebra satisfies relations analogous to the Bost-Connes system: - \(\mu_n^* \mu_n = 1\), \(\mu_k \mu_n = \mu_{kn}\) (arithmetic relations) - \(e(r) e(s) = e(r+s)\), \(e(r)^* = e(-r)\) (phase relations)
- \(\mu_n L_\psi \mu_n^* = n L_\psi\) (geometric scaling)

The time evolution is defined as: - \(\sigma_t(\mu_n) = n^{it} \mu_n\) - \(\sigma_t(e(r)) = e(r)\) - \(\sigma_t(L_\psi) = L_\psi\) (fixed geometry, or scaled if state-dependent)

4. Hamiltonian and Representations

We construct representations \(\pi_\alpha\) on \(\ell^2(\mathbb{N}^\times) \otimes \mathcal{H}_\psi\) where \(\mathcal{H}_\psi = L^2(G_\psi)\) for graph \(G_\psi\). The Hamiltonian decomposes as:

\[H = H_{\text{arith}} \otimes I + I \otimes L_\psi\]

where \(H_{\text{arith}} \epsilon_k = \log k \cdot \epsilon_k\) on the arithmetic basis, tensored with \(L_\psi\) on the geometric part. The full partition function becomes:

\[Z(\beta) = \mathrm{Tr}(e^{-\beta H}) = \zeta(\beta) \cdot \mathrm{Tr}(e^{-\beta L_\psi})\]

---

Proof of Phase Transition

1. KMS Condition Verification

A state \(\phi\) is KMS\(_\beta\) if for all \(a, b \in A\), there exists a holomorphic function \(F_{a,b}(z)\) on the strip \(0 \leq \Re(z) \leq \beta\) such that: - \(F_{a,b}(t) = \phi(a \sigma_t(b))\) - \(F_{a,b}(t + i\beta) = \phi(\sigma_t(b) a)\)

For the arithmetic part, this follows directly from the Bost-Connes construction. For the geometric part, since \(L_\psi\) is self-adjoint positive semi-definite (spectrum \(\lambda_i \geq 0\)), \(e^{-\beta L_\psi}\) is trace-class for \(\beta > 0\), and the tensor ensures the combined condition via separation of variables.

2. High-Temperature Regime (\(\beta \leq 1\)) - Uniqueness

The unique KMS\(_\beta\) state on \(A_{\text{arith}}\) is the tracial state:

\[\phi_\beta^{\text{arith}}(e(a/b)) = b^{-\beta} \prod_{p \mid b} \frac{1 - p^{\beta-1}}{1 - p^{-1}}\]

On \(A_{\text{geom}}\), the Gibbs state:

\[\phi_\beta^{\text{geom}}(x) = \frac{\mathrm{Tr}(x e^{-\beta L_\psi})}{\mathrm{Tr}(e^{-\beta L_\psi})}\]

is unique due to ergodicity properties of graph algebras for connected graphs.

The tensor product state \(\phi_\beta = \phi_\beta^{\text{arith}} \otimes \phi_\beta^{\text{geom}}\) is the unique KMS\(_\beta\) state on \(A\), as any other would violate uniqueness in either factor via modular theory and Tomita-Takesaki decomposition.

3. Low-Temperature Regime (\(\beta > 1\)) - Multiplicity and Extremality

For the arithmetic part, extremal KMS\(_\beta\) states are parameterized by embeddings \(\alpha \in \hat{\mathbb{Z}}^\times\):

\[\phi_{\beta,\alpha}^{\text{arith}}(x) = \zeta(\beta)^{-1} \mathrm{Tr}(\pi_\alpha(x) e^{-\beta H_{\text{arith}}})\]

extremality follows from the irreducibility and inequivalence of representations \(\pi_\alpha\).

The geometric part retains a unique Gibbs state, but tensoring with arithmetic yields states:

\[\phi_{\beta,\alpha} = \phi_{\beta,\alpha}^{\text{arith}} \otimes \phi_\beta^{\text{geom}}\]

inheriting multiplicity from the arithmetic factor. Since \(\hat{\mathbb{Z}}^\times\) is infinite, there are infinitely many such extremal states.

4. Symmetry Breaking Analysis

The symmetry group \(\hat{\mathbb{Z}}^\times\) acts by automorphisms on \(A\) (arithmetic Galois action on phases \(e(r)\), trivial on geometry). At \(\beta > 1\), the action is free and transitive on extremal states \(E_\beta \cong \hat{\mathbb{Z}}^\times\), but each state \(\phi_{\beta,\alpha}\) has stabilizer subgroup:

\[G_\phi = \{ g \in \hat{\mathbb{Z}}^\times \mid g^* \phi = \phi \}\]

leading to spontaneous breaking since inner automorphisms act trivially.

At zero temperature (\(\beta \to \infty\)), weak limits of KMS\(_\beta\) states evaluate the arithmetic subalgebra in \(\mathbb{Q}^{\text{cyc}}\), with Galois action \(\gamma \phi(x) = \phi(\theta(\gamma) x)\) via class field theory, intertwining geometry via \(L_\psi\) with number theory.

5. Phase Transition at \(\beta = 1\)

At \(\beta = 1\), the zeta pole \(\zeta(1) = \infty\) induces a bifurcation. The unique high-temperature state “splits” into the low-temperature manifold via continuity of KMS states in \(\beta\) and the pole of \(\zeta(1)\), causing the trace to diverge and branch into character-parameterized states through residues and analytic continuation.

---

Optimization Implications: The Navokoj Solver

This theorem establishes ShunyaBar as a unified arithmetic-geometric quantum statistical system, where the phase transition enables efficient optimization:

High \(\beta\) regime: Explores multiple “broken symmetry” basins (satisfying assignments) through the multiplicity of extremal states.

Low \(\beta\) regime: Provides global guidance through the unique high-symmetry state, maintaining landscape understanding.

The Navokoj mechanism: Instead of traditional optimizers that collapse to a basin too early and get trapped, ShunyaBar stays in the high-symmetry regime until the landscape is globally understood, then collapses to a solution via phase transition—the assignment crystallizes at \(\beta = 1\).

This approach fundamentally differs from conventional optimization: - Traditional optimizers: Collapse to a basin too early → get trapped - ShunyaBar: Maintains high-symmetry exploration → phase transition crystallization

The solver is Navokoj by ShunyaBar, cooling the system until the assignment crystallizes through controlled phase transition.

---

Mathematical Significance

The ShunyaBar phase transition theorem represents a fundamental synthesis of: - Number theory: via the arithmetic Bost-Connes structure - Spectral geometry: through the graph Laplacian component - Quantum statistical mechanics: through the C*-dynamical system framework - Computational complexity: via optimization applications

This grand unification of arithmetic and geometry through quantum statistical mechanics provides a new paradigm for understanding the relationship between discrete and continuous structures in complex systems.

---

The mathematical framework described here represents ongoing research at ShunyaBar Labs into the fundamental connections between number theory, spectral geometry, and quantum statistical mechanics. The phase transition mechanism offers a new approach to optimization and constraint satisfaction problems by leveraging the natural symmetries of arithmetic-geometric systems.